A New Perspective On The World

Relativistic Thinking: A New Perspective on the World

Children and teenagers often exhibit a tendency towards binary thinking, categorizing people and situations into simplistic and rigid terms rather than considering the nuances of relativistic perspectives. However, as individuals transition into early adulthood, they typically adopt a more adaptable mindset that enables them to reconcile contradictions and embrace diverse viewpoints.

Narrate an instance where either you or someone you are acquainted with had to transcend the limitations of black-and-white thinking and cultivate a more relativistic outlook. Address the following points:

What was it about the situation that challenged you or the other person to think more relativistically?
How do you think people begin to respond to others differently once they begin to use relativistic thinking?

Support your arguments with research, citing sources.

Write your initial response in 150–200 words. Apply APA standards to citation of sources.

By Saturday, September 13, 2014,

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. A New Perspective On The World

Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes. A New Perspective On The World

Write a 1,000 word argumentative paper in which you take a position on one of the following topics. Make sure your paper has a clear thesis on your position, a logical argument that supports your position. It should use at least two of the Learning Resources from Weeks 1 through 3. The material from the Learning Resources used should include at least two citations and quotations. You must also include at least one paragraph of what the other side would say in this argument, and you should try to counter that argument.

The grading rubric for each paper is holistic:

A papers: (90-100) Are strong in grammar, organization, clarity and argumentation, have a clear thesis and an argument or analysis supporting that thesis and are clearly linked to the eResources with some use of at least two citations and quotations. Papers should include at least one paragraph that covers what the other side of the argument would say on this issue. Papers must include at least one paragraph of what the other side would say in this argument. A New Perspective On The World

B papers: (80-89) Lack some of the qualities of A papers but are still reasonably strong.

C papers: (70-79) Lack a good number of the qualities of A papers, and are solid but not strong.

D papers: (60-69) Lack enough of the qualities of this paper that they are below acceptable college standards.

F papers: (0-59) Paper is off-topic. A New Perspective On The World