Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
- Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory on the assumptions they make about the nature of human development.
Cognitive Theory
For each theory:
1) identify the major theorist(s) associated with the theory, and provide a brief description of how this theory emerged/developed;
2) indicate whether or not the theory is associated with the classical or the positivist schools of criminological thought, if either;
3) thoroughly describe the major perspectives and ideas associated with this theory.
Once you’ve covered all of the above points for both of the theories you’ve chosen, in a final concluding paragraph explain how the two theories you’ve chosen are similar or related to one another, and also provide some details describing their major differences from one another. Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
As the Director of a Preschool, that provides care for children six weeks to six years old, understanding the many theories of child development is essential to the success of my students. Working in this field demands that you approach each child as an individual. Therefore, when issues arise in any developmental area, we are forced to use our knowledge to seek out the right solution(s) for that specific child. In 2014, Groark, McCarthy, and Kirk explained:
In viewing one’s knowledge of developmental theories as somewhat of a tool box, an early childhood professional can identify which theory or theories can best help to make sense of the current circumstances.In identifying these theories, the caregiver can identify which approaches might work best to support the growth and development of the children in his or her care, based on the unique characteristics of the situation at hand (Groark, McCarthy, Kirk, 2014, Section 3.11, “Integrating and Using Developmental Theories,” para. 2).
I often find myself educating parents about elements of developmental theories and how they apply to their child. For example, when the concern is that their two-year old can’t write the letters of their name yet, I will explain to them that this is not a developmentally-appropriate activity. The expectations placed on children appear to be at an unrealistic level in my experience. Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
If we want children to be successful learners, we need to encourage their individual growth and development. “When a child learns something and feels positive about the learning experience, the brain is developing optimally” (Gartrell, 2005, p. 84).
Deep value can be found in each of the leading child development theories, however, my beliefs are more in an alignment with Piagets’ Theory of Cognitive Development; children are natural learners. When children are encouraged to explore the world around them, “(they) develop cognitively through their understanding of past experiences and add new information based on new experiences in their environment” (Groark et al.).
By observing and documenting this process, teachers are then able to prepare developmentally appropriate activities for their students. Which leads me to another theory I use as an approach to child development; Gesell’s Maturation Theory. Specifically, the use of milestones as a tracker of development as noted previously. As a child development professional, the knowledge and understanding of one or several developmental theories, is a valuable resource. Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
References
Gartrell, D. (2005). GUIDANCE MATTERS. YC Young Children, 60(6), 84.
Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/197689126?accou…
Groark, McCarthy, Kirk (2014). Early Child Development: From Theory to Practice [Electronic version].
Retrieved from https://content.ashford.edu/
Now: SAM HAS RESPONDED TO THE QUSTION ABOVE WITH:
Each stage has its own unique life cycle. The stages such as childhood, adolescence, adulthood, and old age consist of different periods in the human life cycle. Since each stage or periods differs from each other, I believe that it would be difficult to determine when the stage begins and ends for most of the stages. However, we are able to predict since we have explored through each milestone based on people’s journey. Another reason why it is difficult to determine using biological, cognitive, and psychosocial is that every person is different; that includes the person’s lifespan.
Many people were nurtured differently from each other, as well as how they grew in their environment including cognitive behaviorism. We have our own ways and beliefs and it all different for every person. All of these factors add up to the difficulty of determining a specific stage beginning and its ending even when using biological, cognitive, and psychosocial. Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
Piaget’s cognitive developmental theory from birth to adolescence made more sense to me because he believed that children improve through qualitatively different stages of cognitive growth (Belsky, 2016). Piaget’s stages of development also provides us from age to age of different stages such as sensorimotor, preoperations, concrete operations, and formal operations. Although this stages is different from Erikson’s psychosocial stages, we are able to review the differences and its similarities between the two.
I believe that Erikson’s psychosocial stages does provide very valuable information that gives us a good amount of insights about the life stages and its approximate years for each of the stages. For example, late adulthood we can expect that the stage begins around in the late sixties and beyond (Belsky, 2016). I believe that this general roadmap for human lives allows us to have an idea of approximate life expectancy. Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
I think that in normal development, continuity perspective best describes that since the process and change is done gradually. Everyone is able to gain and learn something gradually in different skills such as talking, acting, thinking, and so on. Discontinuity perspective is when the development is more abrupt, which creates different types of behaviors during life stages.
Although there are different things to consider in many situations such as nature, nurture, stability, and change in all stages, I would personally favor the continuity perspective looking at a positive view and outcome. Compare Freuds Psychoanalytic theory with Piagets Cognitive Development theory
Belsky, J. (2016) Experiencing the lifespan. Retreived from http://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/bedford-freeman-and-worth/2015/experiencing-the-lifespan_4e.php