Describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature that pertains to your focus subject

Describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature that pertains to your focus subject.

Your assignment this week is an important step toward development and completion of your Final Project. You will be describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature that pertains to your focus subject. In order to increase the quantity and quality of the scholarly information that you summarize, start this process several weeks before the Final Project is actually due.

To prepare for this Assignment:

Review the instructions for the Final Project.
Review your choice of case study and focus subject from Week 4.
Review the Learning Resources from the Cornell University Library and the University of Illinois Library regarding the use of scholarly resources.

Submit by Day 7 approximately one page in which you do the following:

Summarize your strategies for conducting a literature search and finding peer-reviewed articles for your research paper.
List 2–4 key words you are using to locate resources.
List 1–3 articles that you found while doing a preliminary search using your strategy.

Note: This preliminary search is just a first step in acquiring and reviewing research for this project

Describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature that pertains to your focus subject

Running Had: SELECTION OF CASE STUDY AND FOCUS AREA 1

SELECTION OF CASE STUDY AND FOCUS AREA 4

Final Project: Selection of Case Study and Focus Area

Jailya Wooden

Walden University

Intersection of Crime, Psychology and the Law

March 24, 2019

Everything you do in psychology you have to write it down in APA. The first insight therefor is reviewing all the resources where you got your research from, where did you get the evidence from, and if it was reliable or not? In the literature review, one has to do a lot of background work. This is a high demand field and therefore one has to get the empirical evidence and this is what supports what you are saying on your paper, such as where you got the evidence from. Describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature

The second insight is operationalizing the studies. Here, one needs to collect the senses then start thinking it through. This is possible through identification of the specific variables and finding a way of listing them down. Then find out how the research was operationalized, the methodologies used, the samples used and finally look at which features are overlapping each other.

Another important insight is to understand the phenomenon under consideration. Here the exact research question is determined. After understanding the questions which need to be addressed, one the makes sure that you give receptive feedbacks. Using these insights will be helpful in finalizing my final project for my course. Describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature

I have selected the Jodi Arias murder case. It is a case about Jodi Arias who killed her ex-lover. The body of Alexander was found five days disintegrated and it was 27 times stabbed with a big gash across his throat and on the head a bullet had been launched. The slayer, his former lover Jodi arias pretended lacking knowledge about the matter and she pleaded not guilty (Sarteschi, 2017). It was after the discovery of racy turned violent encounter images between the two some few hours after the death of Alexander that she changed the story.

On the 15th of May 2013, the aggravation phase of the case started. First-degree murder is what Arias was found guilty of, and the prosecution had to prove to the jury that the murder was cruel or heinous to make her eligible for the death penalty.

On 16th of May 2013, the penalty phase began with the prosecutors calling the family members of Alexander to give a victim impact statement in an effort of convincing the jury that the crime Aria’s committed merited a death sentence (Alt, 2015). On many of the same month, arias offered an allocation where she pleaded for a life sentence. She said that she was avoiding bringing more pain to the members of her family who were present in the courtroom.

On April 13, 2015, Arias was sentenced to life imprisonment by Stephens without the possibility of parole. It is said that until March 5, 2015, her trials cost an estimated $3million. Arias is expected to spend the rest of her life in Arizona state prison complex

I propose to research biased which is witnessed in different cases in the court of law. Taking, for instance, this case of Jodi Arias, a defense expert who had diagnosed Arias with PTSD by the name Richard Samuels was suspected by the prosecutor of having feelings for his patient which made him be biased to his diagnosis. Describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature

He diagnosed Arias with post-traumatic stress disorder and amnesia. This was to ensure that the bench was more lenient on her side when pronouncing their judgment Psychotherapist Alyce LaViolette was also accused of biases concerning the issue about Arias having signed the manifesto which was not explained in court and which had not been entered into evidence. The reason for choosing this topic is because of the increased biases in the court systems which have diverted justice in the wrong direction.

References Describing your strategy to collect and review scholarly peer-reviewed literature

Alt, W. (2015). The Moral Fool: A Case for Amorality by Hans-Georg Moeller. Philosophy East and West, 65(1), 331-341.

Martinez, J. M., & Pulitzer, L. (2016). Conviction: The Untold Story of Putting Jodi Arias Behind Bars. HarperCollins.

Sarteschi, C. M. (2017). Jodi Arias: a case of extreme violence. Violence and gender, 4(3), 109-113.