Phone: +1 601-680-9567
Discussion Giving consideration to the issue of religious prejudice
Discussion Giving consideration to the issue of religious prejudice
Some educational institutions have mandated that employees wish students “Happy Holidays” rather than “Merry Christmas” in recent years. When bias towards religion is taken into account, what advantages does this approach offer? What are some things that could go wrong? Though you may feel strongly about this matter, your response should be objective and address the policy’s merits and weaknesses rather than your preferences. Talk about the problems that people of different races and religions experience.
needs to be 300-400 words
1 reference
APA format
Conduct an ethical analysis of your debate topic using the Framework for Making Ethical Decisions.https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions
Make sure you read the Framework thoroughly before proceeding. If you are a biocentrist or ecocentrist you should broaden your consideration to animals, plants, species and ecosystems, accordingly. Discussion Giving consideration to the issue of religious prejudice
You are not defending the debate position you have taken (if any), but rather thinking critically about the issue at hand.
Please answer the questions below and provide a typed copy. Make sure you provide an explanation for your answers to each question.
To what extent might this choice or circumstance harm individuals, communities, or ecosystems? Is there a good option and a poor option, or are there two “goods” or two “bads” to choose from? Explain.
Question 2: Is there more to this than just following the rules and making the greatest money? How, if so.
Thirdly, what are the key details of the situation? Which details remain unknown? May I inquire further into the matter? Can I trust my own judgement?
Four, what people or organisations (or animal or plant communities) have a lot riding on the outcome? Is there a higher priority on some issues? Why?
5 What are the available courses of action? Have the right people and organisations been asked for input? Do I have a list of ideas I can use?
6-Evaluate the options by asking the following questions:
*Which option will produce the most good and do the least harm? (The Utilitarian Approach). Explain.
*Which option best respects the rights of all who have a stake? (The Rights Approach). Explain. Discussion Giving consideration to the issue of religious prejudice
*Which option treats people (or other species/ecosystems) equally or proportionally? (The Justice Approach). Explain.
*Which option best serves the community as a whole, not just some members? (The Common Good Approach). Explain
*Which option leads me to act as the sort of person I want to be? (The Virtue Approach). Explain.
7-Considering all these approaches, which option best addresses the situation? Explain why?
8-If I told someone I respect — or told a television audience — which option I have chosen, what would they say?
The debate topic is (The U.S. should expand nuclear power)
Resources for the topic:
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-virtue/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-deontological/
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/consequentialism/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-a739VjqdSI
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8bIys6JoEDw
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PrvtOWEXDIQ
Initial Post:
Post one substantive message that reflects on the assigned learning materials for this Module. Specifically, your initial post should respond to the following prompts. Discussion Giving consideration to the issue of religious prejudice
What are the most important and/or interesting things you learned from the course materials this week? Explain.
How will you use this new information in your academic studies, work, personal relationships, etc?
What are the most important questions you still have about the material? How might you go about finding out how to answer these questions?
Responses:
After you type your initial post by then read through the other entries and reply directly to at least two classmates. Note: You must post a message before you can post replies. When you reply, ALWAYS type the name of the classmate you are responding to, and your name at the bottom of the message. Make sure to use proper grammar and punctuation in this college level course in all correspondence. Please avoid “text” or “twitter speak” when corresponding. Discussion Giving consideration to the issue of religious prejudice
At a minimum, each reply should include:
a compliment
a comment
a connection and
a question.
I will send you the students answer as soon as its posted. The learning material for this module is the uploaded file and the following links:
https://www.brown.edu/academics/science-and-technology-studies/framework-making-ethical-decisions