Dual-Store Model Of Memory Paper
In Modules/Weeks 1, 2, 4, and 5 you will participate in the Discussion Board Forums. Dual-Store Model Of Memory PaperFor each forum, you will post at least 300 words in response to a provided prompt, supporting your assertions with at least 3 citations in proper, current APA format. Required sources are the textbook and a scholarly article (no websites, newspaper articles, etc.), and you must include at least 1 biblical reference with chapter and verse. In addition to your thread, you must also respond to at least 2 classmates, posting replies of at least 150 words each. Refer to the provided rubric to ensure guidelines are followed. You are encouraged to post your thread early, to allow the opportunity to further the topic of discussion.
Topic: Dual-Store Model of Memory
Question/Prompt: Discuss all 3 components of the Dual-Store Model of Memory. Give an example of the development of a piece of information through all 3 structures of your memory according to the Dual-Store Model. At each stage, give the verbal or visual stimulus and the cognitive processing for transferring information between stages. Include clear biblical principles in your response
The Multi store Model of Memory The multi store model is a representation of memory based on having more than one different kind of store for remembered information. Atkinson and Shiffrin (1968) proposed this model based on evidence related to the separate stores of memory (e.g. serial position: primacy recency, forgetting etc.). It suggests that memory comprises of three separate stores, the sensory memory store, the short-term memory and the long-term memory, each store having a specific and relatively inflexible function: Information enters and is initially stored in SM which holds information for very brief periods of time if the information is not concentrated on. However, if a…show more content…
Later, he frequently asked about his uncle and, on each occasion, reacted again with the level of grief appropriate to hearing the news for the first time.Dual-Store Model Of Memory Paper KF, a motorcycle accident victim investigated by Shallice and Warrington (1970), suffered from the reverse of this memory impairment. He had no difficulty in transferring new items into LTM but had a grossly impaired digit span. Cases such as these lend support to the Atkinson and Shiffrin model, in that they seem to point to a clear distinction between LTM and STM. There does seem to be fairly strong support for a difference between LTM and STM in terms of duration, capacity and effects of brain damage. However, there are problems with the model of Atkinson and Shiffrin. The model is too simple and inflexible and fails to take account of factors such as the strategies people employ to remember things. It also places emphasis on the amount of information that can be processed rather than its nature. Some things are simply easier to remember than others, perhaps because they are more interesting, more distinctive, funnier, or whatever. The multistore model cannot account for this. Furthermore, alternative explanations can account for the empirical findings e.g. the levels of processing model. This model was put forward by Craik and Lockhart (1972). According to them, processing varies in terms of depth, ‘Trace Dual-Store Model Of Memory Paper