NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

Help me study for my Nursing class. I’m stuck and don’t understand.

Discussion: Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists

Nature offers many examples of specialization and collaboration. Ant colonies and bee hives are but two examples of nature’s sophisticated organizations. Each thrives because their members specialize by tasks, divide labor, and collaborate to ensure food, safety, and general well-being of the colony or hive.

Of course, humans don’t fare too badly in this regard either. And healthcare is a great example. As specialists in the collection, access, and application of data, nurse informaticists collaborate with specialists on a regular basis to ensure that appropriate data is available to make decisions and take actions to ensure the general well-being of patients.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your own observations of and/or experiences with informaticist collaboration. You will also propose strategies for how these collaborative experiences might be improved.

Interaction Between Nurse Informaticists and Other Specialists Sample Papers

Student #1A E 

Discussion Post (Week 3)

              Within my current healthcare organization, I have the daily pleasure of working on several investigational studies.  Each of those studies call for the frequent collaboration between study coordinators, data managers, and system/technology specialists.  Because of this, I have been able to observe these interactions and can attest to how communication and a meticulous attention to detail tie into a study’s success.  One example of this collaboration would be when study coordinators must ensure that they collect all of the correct information that the electronic data capture (EDC) system requires.

As identified by Mosier et al. (2017), evidence-based clinical documentation (EBCD) design must be incorporated to guarantee that the final product supports the process of documenting all aspects of patient care. For example, there are typically many clinical and laboratory documentation requirements that make up a study’s framework.  In order to meet these requirements, technology specialists tend to “build” pre-filled clinical notes within the electronic medical record (EMR) to aid clinicians and study coordinators in conducting participant visits.

Without these pre-filled notes, many study personnel would run the risk of missing valuable information—further making the study difficult to execute. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

One strategy that I would suggest, if not already implemented at facility, is to plan ahead in order to allow for the traditional back and forth of collaboration.  It is beneficial to note that “a protocol, whether experimental or clinical, serves as a navigator that evolves from a basic outline of the study plan to become a qualified research or grant proposal” (Balakumar et al., 2013).

In my current organization, I have witnessed a few times when industry requirements posed a rather emergent deadline for getting a study off of the ground.  Because of this, many of the elements were overlooked and became issues at a later date.  Should a clinical order be missed, a protocol deviation could occur and further jeopardize the study’s credibility and outcome.  This is why advance planning is so important—study coordinators must seek the expertise of technology specialists to make sure that all of the required orders are present within the EMR. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

When it comes to the potential impact that the continued evolution of nursing informatics has on professional interactions, I believe that the emergence of new technologies is a likely outcome.  As time goes along, we are bound to see many advancements that ease provider workload and streamline patient care.  In my opinion, it is all about innovation and it is our responsibility to ensure that the standard of care continues to climb vertically and not become stagnant. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

As confirmed by Sipes (2016), there have been many recommendations for developing technology-related knowledge and skills within the workforce of 2020 (p. 255).  Professional interactions will likely be affected, because the daily technological requirements will call for specialists to take the lead on many projects due to their knowledge the immeasurable value that they possess.

NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion References

Balakumar, P., Inamdar, M. N., & Jagadeesh, G. (2013). The critical steps for successful research: The research proposal and scientific writing: (A report on the pre-conference workshop held in conjunction with the 64(th) annual conference of the Indian Pharmaceutical Congress-2012). Journal of pharmacology & pharmacotherapeutics, 4(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.4103/0976-500X.110895

Mosier, S., Roberts, W.D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions: The Role of Executive Leadership. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49(11), 543-548.

Sipes, C. (2016). Project Management: Essential skill of nurse informaticists. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252–256.

Student #2 F O 

NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion RE: Discussion – Week 3

Nursing informatics is a modern high-level technical operation of nurses. Nursing informatics require computer skills, information technology, and data each day to successfully  evaluate systems, patient care practices, and healthcare initiatives. They analyze data to determine what is working effectively and what is not while using established findings to propose advancements, lead programs, and necessary changes (Mosier et al., 2019).  Nursing informatics should work jointly with other professionals in the medical fields, for example doctors, other nurses, occupational therapist, and psychologists, to ensure the quality of care (McGonigle &Mastrain, 2015).

Such interactions should be improved by ensuring that nursing informatics provide healthcare to patients in different settings, units, and departments while working with all medical professionals to guarantee successful patient-centered care.

Nursing informatics are involved in analyzing  data to improve patient care and enable healthcare facilities to establish novel and useful expertise. They research, suggest, and employ new technology while training other health professionals to use such knowledge in answering questions, providing care to patients, and monitoring results (Ng et al., 2018).  Contrary to nurses’ traditional tasks that centered only on providing one-on-one care to patients, nursing informatics advocate steps that should be taken to improve patient safety and outcomes in a given department, units, facility, or the entire healthcare system.

Some of the projects that could help nursing informatics to improve outcomes and effectiveness in healthcare organizations include enabling all stakeholders to have enhanced access to electronic records, diagnostics, and patient care plans. Some significant nursing informatics projects’ influential stakeholders include all nurses doctors, patients and their family members, the nursing association, lawmakers, and all medical professionals.

Enhanced collaboration and communication among stakeholders make it simple to tackle healthcare work flows, facilitate coordination, and improve patient outcomes (McGonigle & Mastrain, 2015). Facilitation of data access will necessitates system integration, which will make information and analysis essential. Another project would be the improvement of clinical strategies, protocols, practices and procedures.  NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

Nurse informaticists should regularly gauge and assess how particular care delivery segments are performing while focusing on patient outcomes. They could advocate changes and improvement in poorly performing practices to guarantee positive patient outcomes. Moreover, nurse informaticists should provide training and learning anchored on unbiased data.

They should train other health professionals on technology-based aspects and employ data to identify rampant problems in health institutions while consulting on the most successful means of resolving underlying issues (Ng et al., 2018). This will enable nurse  informatics to generate highly targeted programs to address existing gaps between capacity and provider anticipations. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

Projects undertaken by nursing informatics improve healthcare delivery outcomes by enhancing the selection and testing of new health devices that can offer vast quantities of patients’ medical data. Nursing informatics are characteristically positioned to fathom actual worth of data and give suggestions on the best practices of recording, accessing, and using it to ensure quality of care. Engaging them in the choice of valuable health devices will make sure that medical professionals have an added advantage in understanding how technological gadgets can improve diagnostics, care plans, and eventually, patient outcomes.

Nursing informatics projects also assist in the reduction of medical errors and unnecessary costs (McGonigle & Mastrin, 2015). Collaboration among nursing informatics, patients and their relatives, doctors, and other health professionals ensures a vast pool of decisions that make all stakeholders well-informed, which helps avoid mistakes. Additionally, the incorporation of regular staff training and development, process enhancement, and application of best practices will ensure the quality of care and prevent patient risks.

NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion References

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K.G. (Eds). (2015). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (3rd ed.) Jones &Bartlett Publishers

Mosier, S., Roberts, W.D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A systems-level method for developing nursing informatics solutions: The role of executive leadership. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 49 (11), 543-548.

https://doi.org/10.1097/NNA.0000000000000815

Ng, Y.C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). Integration of mobile health application in health information technology initiatives: Expanding opportunities for nurse participation in population health. CIN: Computers, informatics, Nursing, 36 (5), 209-213. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000445

NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion Required Readings

McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning.

  • Chapter 25, “The Art of Caring in Technology-Laden Environments” (pp. 525–535)
  • Chapter 26, “Nursing Informatics and the Foundation of Knowledge” (pp. 537–551)

Mosier, S., Roberts, W. D., & Englebright, J. (2019). A Systems-Level Method for Developing Nursing Informatics Solutions: The Role of Executive Leadership. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration49(11), 543-548.

Ng, Y. C., Alexander, S., & Frith, K. H. (2018). Integration of Mobile Health Applications in Health Information Technology Initiatives: Expanding Opportunities for Nurse Participation in Population Health. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing36(5), 209-213.

Sipes, C. (2016). Project management: Essential skill of nurse informaticists. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 225, 252-256.

NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion Rubric Detail

  Excellent Good Fair Poor
Main Posting 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)

Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

 

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.

 

Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

 

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

 

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Post is cited with two credible sources.

 

Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Contains some APA formatting errors.

0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

 

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

 

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

 

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

 

Contains only one or no credible sources.

 

Not written clearly or concisely.

 

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

 

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

Main Post: Timeliness 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)

Posts main post by day 3. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not post by day 3.

First Response 17 (17%) – 18 (18%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

13 (13%) – 14 (14%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

0 (0%) – 12 (12%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response 16 (16%) – 17 (17%)

Response exhibits synthesis, critical thinking, and application to practice settings.

 

Responds fully to questions posed by faculty.

 

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by at least two scholarly sources.

 

Demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

 

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

 

Responses to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

 

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

. 12 (12%) – 13 (13%)

Response is on topic and may have some depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion may lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

 

Response may lack clear, concise opinions and ideas, and a few or no credible sources are cited. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

0 (0%) – 11 (11%)

Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

 

Responses posted in the discussion lack effective professional communication.

 

Responses to faculty questions are missing.

 

No credible sources are cited. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

Participation 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for participation by posting on three different days.NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

0 (0%) – 0 (0%) 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Does not meet requirements for participation by posting on 3 different days. NURS 6051 WU Wk 3 Nurse Informatics and Other Specialists Discussion

Total Points: 100