Post a description of two ways the guidelines in Walden University

Post a description of two ways the guidelines in Walden University’s IRB document may impact the selection of a research population, research setting, and/or research design. Please use the resources to support your answer.

By Day 7

Respond to a colleague’s post in one of the following ways:

Expand upon your colleague’s post regarding ways that the IRB’s ethical guidelines may impact his or her study.
Explain an insight you gained from this week’s Resources that addresses a topic in your colleague’s post.

Christie Response to Question

A description of two ways the guidelines in Walden University’s IRB document may impact the selection of a research population, research setting, and/or research design.

The Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Walden University has the potential to influence a significant number of the variables within a research study. According to Yegidis, Weinback, and Myers (2012), the IRB guidelines were developed to ensure the safety of people who took part in research studies. Because of this procedure, it is ensured that researchers and students are not taking advantage of vulnerable populations or failing to take into consideration the cultural diversity that exists among the participant pool. The Independent Review Board at Walden University identifies unanticipated conflicts of interest and serves as a safety measure to ensure that the benefits of the study outweigh its potential drawbacks.

This might imply that there is no research done in jails or that inmates are not used as subjects in studies. Furthermore, the Institutional Review Board at the university may have an impact on the design of the research. For instance, including the process by which data is gathered in order to inform the board, thereby ensuring that confidentiality will not be violated and that beneficence will be maintained (Walden University, n.d.). Post a description of two ways the guidelines in Walden University

For instance, all instruments, interactions, interventions must be known so that any inadvertent ethical issues can be reviewed and avoided. Walden’s systematic investigation will not accept any responsibility for student research without going through the IRB process. Another positive aspect of the IRB is its ability to detect harm not only to the participant but also the researcher (Yegidis, et al., 2012). Also, the university’s IRB allows for “exempt status” of research with no potential for human risk which opens up a vast opportunity for examining gaps in instructional education improvement (Walden University, n.d.). Walden is diligent in its reviews and stays in a continual learning modality for new ways of improving the process.

References

Walden University. (n.d.). Academic Guidelines: Research Ethics and Compliance: Welcome from the IRB. Retrieved March 8, 2018. From http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/researchcenter/
Yegidis, B. L., Weinbach, R. W., & Myers, L. L. (2012). Research methods for social workers (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.

The early years of the 20th century were host to a number of unethical research studies. Research involving the way that a young child reacts to and generalizes fear responses, medical experiments conducted in concentration camps, and observing the way people respond to authority were just a few of the most famous experiments whose byproduct was placing clients in physical pain and/or mental anguish. Post a description of two ways the guidelines in Walden University

Since then, it has been recognized that research subjects need to be protected from the flagrant disregard of researchers. This week, you consider the guidelines in Walden University’s Institutional Review Board (IRB) document, “Research Ethics FAQs for Doctoral Students in the Clinical/Intervention Fields: Practical Tips for Avoiding Delays and Problems in the Research Approval Process.”