Psychotherapy For Clients With Addictive Disorders

Psychotherapy For Clients With Addictive Disorders

Psychotherapy For Clients With Addictive Disorders

Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families.

  • attachment

    NRNP6645Week8AssignmentRubricDetails.html
  • attachment

    NRNP6645WK8AssignmentInstructionsDirections.docx
  • attachment

    NRNP6645WK8REQUIREDVIDEOTRANSCRIPTTHELINK.docx

Rubric Detail

Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.

Content

Name: NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric

 

Excellent 90%–100% Good 80%–89% Fair 70%–79% Poor 0%–69%
Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders. •Provide an overview of the article you selected, including: What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used? What were the author’s claims? Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a description of the author’s claims. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing. Feedback:
o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why? Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing. Feedback:
• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. Points: Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing. Feedback:
•Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides. Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included. Feedback:
• Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Points: Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide. PDFs of sources may be missing. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The presentation is supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, or the sources are missing. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:
Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation Points: Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Feedback: Points: Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:

Show Descriptions Show Feedback

Develop a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation on your selected research article discussing a therapeutic approach for treating clients, families, or groups with addictive disorders. •Provide an overview of the article you selected, including: What population (individual, group, or family) is under consideration? What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used? What were the author’s claims?–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 18 (18%) – 20 (20%) The presentation thoroughly and accurately defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is fully and accurately described. The description clearly indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a thorough and accurate description of the author’s claims. Good 80%–89% 16 (16%) – 17 (17%) The presentation defines the considered population. The specific intervention used is described. The description indicates whether the intervention is new or whether it was already studied. The response includes a description of the author’s claims. Fair 70%–79% 14 (14%) – 15 (15%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 13 (13%) There is an incomplete definition of the considered population, or it is missing. The specific intervention used is partially or inaccurately described, or is missing. The response includes a partial or inaccurate description of the author’s claims, or is missing. Feedback:

o Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your clients. If so, how? If not, why?–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate review of the findings of the selected article. The response fully addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes a review of the findings of the selected article. The response addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete review of the findings of the selected article. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate and incomplete review of the findings of the selected article, or is missing. The response partially or inaccurately addresses whether or not the outcomes will translate into practice with clients, or is missing. Feedback:

• Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 23 (23%) – 25 (25%) The presentation includes a thorough and accurate explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Good 80%–89% 20 (20%) – 22 (22%) The presentation includes an explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Fair 70%–79% 18 (18%) – 19 (19%) The presentation includes a somewhat inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 17 (17%) The presentation includes an inaccurate or incomplete explanation of the whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings presented in the article, or is missing. Feedback:

•Use the Notes function of PowerPoint to craft presenter notes to expand upon the content of your slides.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The Notes function of the presentation is appropriately used to comprehensively expand upon the presentation slides. Good 80%–89% 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The Notes function of the presentation is adequately used to expand upon the presentation slides. Fair 70%–79% 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The Notes function of the presentation is utilized but notes are vague or contain small inaccuracies. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The Notes function of the presentation partially or inaccurately expands upon the presentation slides, or is not included. Feedback:

• Support your response with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based sources. Explain why each of your supporting sources is scholarly. References are included on your last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission.–

ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS 

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 9 (9%) – 10 (10%) The presentation is strongly supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Good 80%–89% 8 (8%) – 8 (8%) The presentation is supported with at least three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. References are included on the last slide. PDFs of sources are included with submission. Fair 70%–79% 7 (7%) – 7 (7%) The presentation is supported with two or three peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources. Accurate references may not be included on the last slide. PDFs of sources may be missing. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 6 (6%) The presentation is supported with resources peer-reviewed, evidence-based, scholarly sources, or the sources are missing. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – Style and Organization: Slides are clear and not overly crowded. Sentences in presenter notes are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Slides are clear, concise, and visually appealing. Sentences in presenter notes follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Slides are clear and concise. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Slides may be somewhat unorganized or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Slides are unorganized and/or crowded. Sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. Feedback:

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation–

Levels of Achievement: Excellent 90%–100% 5 (5%) – 5 (5%) Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. Good 80%–89% 4 (4%) – 4 (4%) Contains 1 or 2 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Fair 70%–79% 3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%) Contains 3 or 4 grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. Poor 0%–69% 0 (0%) – 3 (3%) Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. Feedback:

Total Points: 100

Name: NRNP_6645_Week8_Assignment_Rubric