Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Discussion

Discussion: Workplace Environment Assessment

How healthy is your workplace?

You may think your current organization is running smoothly, or you may feel like it has a lot of problems. You can experience or even observe things that make you think. However, while you should not attempt to determine a patient’s state of health by observation alone, you should also not attempt to judge the health of your work environment based on observations and ideas.

There are often problems that you consider to be problems that others don’t see; Likewise, the problems can be much deeper than leaders admit. Many factors and measures can affect the health of an organization. Among these is civilization. While an organization can put in place policies designed to promote things like civilization, how do you ensure these are being managed effectively? In this discussion, you will examine the use of tools to measure politeness in the workplace.

To Prepare:

Review the Resources and examine the Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory, found on page 20 of Clark (2015).
Review and complete the Work Environment Assessment Template in the Resources.

Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Discussion REQUIRED RESOURCES:

Marshall, E., & Broome, M. (2017). Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to influential leader (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.

Chapter 5, “Collaborative Leadership Contexts: Networks, Communication, Decision Making, and Motivation” (pp. 121–144)
Chapter 9, “Creating and Shaping the Organizational Environment and Culture to Support Practice Excellence” (pp. 247–278)
Chapter 10, “Building Cohesive and Effective Teams” (pp. 279–298)

https://www.myamericannurse.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/ant11-CE-Civility-1023.pdf

Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Discussion Rubric

MAIN POSTING—

Excellent 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)Answers all parts of the discussion question(s) expectations with reflective critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

Supported by at least three current, credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Good 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Responds to the discussion question(s) and is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

At least 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.Supported by at least three credible sources.Written clearly and concisely with one or no grammatical or spelling errors and fully adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.Fair 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to some of the discussion question(s).

One or two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Post is cited with two credible sources.Written somewhat concisely; may contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Contains some APA formatting errors.Poor 0 (0%) – 34 (34%)

Does not respond to the discussion question(s) adequately.

Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.Contains only one or no credible sources.Not written clearly or concisely.Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Discussion

MAIN POST: TIMELINESS—

Excellent 10 (10%) – 10 (10%)Posts main post by day 3.

Good 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Fair 0 (0%) – 0 (0%)

Poor 0 (0%) – 0 (0%) Walden University NURS 6053 Week 7 Workplace Environment Discussion