MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

Course Code MGT-410 Class Code MGT-410-ETR900A Criteria Content Percentage 70.0% National Culture and Religious Viewpoint 5.0% Servant Leadership in a Religion (different from Christianity) 10.0% Servant Leadership and National Cultures 10.0% Similarities between Cultural Values and SL Characteristics 10.0% Differences between Cultural Values and SL Characteristics 10.0% Similarities between selected Religious Values (other than Christianity) and SL Characteristics and Philosophies 10.0% Differences between Selected Religious Values (other than Christianity) and SL Characteristics 10.0% Conclusion 5.0% Organization and Effectiveness 20.0% MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper Thesis Development and Purpose 7.0% Argument Logic and Construction 8.0% Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Format 10.0% Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 5.0% Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 5.0% Total Weightage 100% Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Identification of a national culture and one religious viewpoint culture are not discussed in the text is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected religion is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. 10%tAn explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected national culture is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. A conclusion is absent, incomplete, inappropriate, or irrelevant. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses non-credible sources. Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Template is not used appropriately, or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Sources are not documented. 130.0 Less than Satisfactory (65.00%) Identification of a national culture and one religious viewpoint culture is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected religion is vague or incomplete. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected national culture is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is vague or incomplete. Supporting material is often confusing or inappropriate. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

A conclusion is vague or incomplete. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Satisfactory (75.00%) Identification of a national culture and one religious viewpoint not discussed in the text is partially present, but contains some inconsistencies. An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the religion is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected national culture is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided.MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint, is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline acceptable quality and quantity is provided. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint, is provided, but at a cursory level and may contain some inconsistencies. Supporting material of baseline. A conclusion is partially present, but contains some inconsistencies. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Good (85.00%) Identification of a national culture and one religious viewpoint culture are is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average. An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected religion is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected national culture is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided. A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is clear and integrated. Supporting material of above average quality and quantity is provided.MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

A conclusion is clear and integrated. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Argument shows logical progression. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Excellent (100.00%) Identification of a national culture and one religious viewpoint not discussed in the text is thorough and well informed An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected religion is thorough and well integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. An explanation of evidence of the servant leadership within the selected national culture is thorough and well integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is thorough and well integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected national culture is thorough and well integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. A description of the similarities between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is thorough and well integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. Comments A description of the differences between servant leadership philosophies and the values evident in the selected religious viewpoint is thorough and well integrated. Supporting material of exceptional quality and quantity is provided. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

A conclusion is thorough and well informed. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear. Clear and convincing argument presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English. All format elements are correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error. Points Earned Introduction Grand Canyon University GCU Style Guide for Lower-Division Students Lower-division students of Grand Canyon University (GCU) are required to use a writing style based upon a simplified version of the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (APA) for preparing written assignments, except where otherwise noted. In the interest of providing resource material for student use, this guide to GCU style and format has been developed and made available. A template has been provided in the Student Success Center’s Writing Center for student download and use. PLEASE NOTE: The curriculum materials (Syllabus, Lectures, Resources, etc.) created and provided by GCU in the online or Web-enhanced modalities are prepared using an editorial format that relies on APA as a framework but that modifies some format and formatting criteria to better suit the nature and purpose of instructional materials. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

Students and faculty are advised that GCU course materials do not adhere strictly to APA format and should not be used as examples of correct format when preparing written work for class. GCU Style General Academic writing, which is independent thought supported by reliable and relevant research, depends on the ability to integrate and cite the sources that have been consulted. Use GCU style for all references, in-text citations, formatting, etc. If this GCU Style Guide does not provide an example of a reference note for a specific type of source, refer to the APA style. The APA style guide can be located in the Student Success Center under the Writing Center. Helpful sites and resources can also be found at the GCU Library Citing Sources Research Guide at http:// libguides.gcu.edu/CitingSources. Use one space after punctuation marks at the end of a sentence. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

Write in third-person point of view unless otherwise noted. Use first- and second-person sparingly, if ever. This means, avoid using I, we, and you; instead, use he, she, and they. Do not use contractions (e.g., it’s, don’t, should’ve). The Writing Process Students should become familiar with “The Writing Process” tutorial, located in the Student Success Center. This multimedia resource walks students through the process of writing by © 2016 Grand Canyon University 1! Last updated: November 4, 2016 explaining and demonstrating the organization, drafting, editing, revision, and finalization of written papers. It also provides valuable information on the research process, locating and citing sources, and how to paraphrase and use quotations. This is an essential tool students can use to improve their writing and should be used in conjunction with the GCU Style Guide. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

Paper Organization and Presentation The standard organization of a GCU style paper includes the paper heading, the body, and references. However, students are required to follow any specific directions given in the syllabus or assignment rubrics that may differ from this standard. Students can access a template for GCU Style paper format in the Student Success Center under the Writing Center. Students can write over the template instructions and be certain the paper is in the proper, GCU style format. Paper Heading The paper heading includes four lines in the upper left-hand corner of the first page. The student’s name, the course number, the date of submission, and the instructor’s name each take up their own line. The whole paper, including the heading, body, and references should be doublespaced. An example paper heading would look like: ! Figure 1 – Example of paper heading (document page viewpoint) Body The body will contain all of the author’s main points as well as detailed and documented support for those ideas. © 2016 Grand Canyon University 2! Last updated: MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

November 4, 2016 The title is centered on the line after the paper heading, in initial caps. Refer to the GCU Style Guide Template for an example. Due to the nature of most student essays, there is not usually a need for section headings and subheadings (Introduction, Methods, Conclusion, etc.). If guidelines are required or helpful, ensure there is a clear break in the flow of text and that the new heading/subheading is easy to spot. References The References list provides the information necessary for a reader to locate and retrieve any source cited in the body of the essay. The reference list should be on a new page, separate from and following the body of the essay. Label this page References (with no quotation marks, underlining, etc.), centered at the top of the page. The References page should be double-spaced just like the rest of your essay. References on the References page are presented consistent with the following: • All lines after the first line of each entry in the reference list should be indented a half inch (0.5″) from the left margin. This is called hanging indentation. • MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper Authors’ names are inverted (last name first); give the last name and initials for all authors of a particular work. • Reference list entries should be alphabetized by the last name of the first author of each work. MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

• See the Reference list section and examples in this document for details on specific conventions. Preparing References and Citations for Sources Used in Papers Citations are used to reference material from another source. Using citations to give credit to others whose ideas or words you have used is an essential requirement to avoid issues of plagiarism. Just as you would never steal someone else’s car, you should not steal their words either. To avoid potential problems, always cite your sources. Common knowledge does not need to be cited. However, determining if a fact is common knowledge can be difficult, so when in doubt, cite the material. Not properly citing a resource is plagiarism; please refer to GCU’s policy on Plagiarism in the University Policy Handbook. © 2016 Grand Canyon University 3! MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper Last updated: November 4, 2016 In-Text Citations When to Cite All quotations, paraphrases, and summaries must be documented with an in-text-citation and reference note. In general, include an in-text citation immediately preceding or following the quote, paraphrase, or summary used. GCU style allows the writer to use one in-text citation at the end of a paragraph when only one source is used in that paragraph, even when multiple sentences have been paraphrased from the same source.MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

How to In-Text Cite PARAPHRASING AND DIRECT QUOTES When paraphrasing a source (writing in your own words) the in-text citations should include the author(s) last name and the publication date in parentheses. For a direct quotations (using three or more words in a row that are the same as the source), citations should include author(s), date, and page number(s) in parentheses. If there is no author, then the first few words of the title, enclosed in quotation marks, are used in the author’s place, followed by the date. If there is no date, the abbreviation “n.d.” is used. If a resource has no page number (as is often the case in electronic resources like websites) and a direct quote is used in text, indicate the paragraph number where the quote is located preceded by the abbreviation “para.” Examples: • For paraphrasing: There are many concerns over the impact of the No Child Left behind act on public education (Ornstein & Levine, 2008). • For direct quotes: “Ethics examines moral values and the standards of ethical behavior” (Ornstein & Levine, 2008, p. 162). • MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper

For no author: (“The Scientific Revolution”, 2005) • For no date: (Jones, n.d.) • For no page number: (“Seventeen Moments in Soviet History,” n.d., para. 2) SOURCES WITH MULTIPLE AUTHORS For a work by two authors, cite both last names followed by year for every citation. For a work by three to five authors, cite all last names followed by year on first reference, and the first author’s last name followed by the abbreviation “et al.” and the year for subsequent references © 2016 Grand Canyon University 4! Last updated: November 4, 2016 (and page numbers for direct quotations). MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper For a work by six or more authors, cite last name of the first author followed by the abbreviation “et al.” and the year on the first reference and all subsequent references. Examples: • Two authors: (Walker & Allen, 2004) • Three or more authors (first reference): (Bradley, Ramirez, Soo, & Walsh, 2006) • Three or more authors (subsequent references): (Bradley et al., 2006) • Six or more authors (direct quote): (Wasserstein et al., 2005, pp. 345-347) CITING SECONDARY SOURCES Often, information will be found in a source that originated in another source. If this information is desired for use in a paper, i… MGT410 Servant Leadership in Diverse Contexts Paper