NURS-FPX6011 Assessment 3 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Paper

Evidenced-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Example

Introduction.

Obesity is a significant health concern in society today. It is defined as a condition where there is excessive body fat and is usually characterized by a body mass index (BMI) of 30 or more (Tyson et al., 2018). Obesity predisposes individuals to several complications, including cardiovascular diseases, diabetes, hypertension, and cancer, among other complications.

The World Health Organization (WHO) estimates that obesity has tripled since 1975 to date, with an estimated 650 million people reported to be obese in 2016 (Liu et al., 2019). In most countries globally, obesity results in greater mortality than complications resulting from undernutrition. This paper aims to highlight a health improvement plan that addresses the issue of obesity in my immediate environment.

Environmental and epidemiological data regarding my community.

Cardiovascular complications and obesity are some of the major health concerns in Minnesota. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) reported a 0.6% rise in the obesity rates in Minnesota from 30.1% in 2019 to 30.7% in 2020 (Jastreboff et al., 2018). Despite this change not being quite significant, it is a clear reflection of the growing issue of obesity both at the state level and nationally.

Cancer and heart disease are the major health concerns in Minnesota, according to data presented by the CDC in 2016 (Kadota et al., 2018). These conditions are mostly complications resulting from conditions such as obesity. To minimize the disease burden, it is clear that obesity needs to be addressed. Environmental factors contributing to obesity and other health concerns include a poor diet. Most people consume junk foods and are heavy alcohol consumers contributing majorly to obesity. Sedentary lifestyles and minimal levels of physical activities among residents are other major contributing factors to increased incidences of obesity.

Health improvement plan.

A key health improvement plan addressing obesity is dietary or nutritional intervention. This intervention aims at reducing the consumption of foods containing large amounts of carbs and saturated fats. Replacing these foods with those rich in proteins, vitamins, other micronutrients, and polyunsaturated fats is critical in addressing obesity (Wolfenden et al., 2018). Educating residents through open forums and other available channels on the importance of a healthy diet and complications related to obesity is a critical step in encouraging change.

Discouraging the excessive consumption of alcohol among residents is another vital component of reducing the incidence of obesity. The state can also provide subsidies on foodstuffs such as vegetables, fish, and other healthy foodstuffs to minimize the cost of these products and encourage more and more people to consume healthier diets, consequently addressing obesity.

Physical activities and exercises are other interventions that are critical in addressing obesity (Xiao et al., 2022). Encouraging citizens to be physically fit while also creating environments that promote physical fitness where individuals work, live, learn and play is important and can go a long way in addressing obesity.

Value and Relevance of The Evidence.

Basing our health improvement plan on evidence is important since the evidence aims to provide the most effective available care. The overall aim of this care is to ensure the improvement of the patient’s outcomes. Evidence is critical in refuting arguments and informing decision-making based on strategies that have been proven effective. Evidence provides a chance to analyze data and further assess the efficiency of various interventions. This makes it possible to identify what works and what does not, making it easier to identify strategies that work, thus implementing the said strategies.

Criteria to Evaluate the Achievement of your Health Improvement Plan’s Outcomes.

Evaluating a health improvement plan entails engaging all stakeholders involved in the whole implementation process. Stakeholders entail participants and governmental and non-governmental organizations taking part in the program. A proper description of the program is important in understanding what the program is designed to achieve. Focusing on the evaluation is the next important step. This entails determining what is most critical to the involved parties.

The results and resources involved are some of the critical aspects that require evaluation. The collection of evidence is another crucial component of any evaluation process. Data collection assessing the effectiveness and expenditure of each intervention in conjunction with data collection from involved parties is important in assessing the interventions. Recommendations from the evaluation help to further guide the future implementation of the interventions.

How to Apply Strategies For Communicating With Community Members And Colleagues In The Health Care Profession.

One of the initial steps in coming up with a communication strategy is analyzing the current method of communication. Before making adjustments, it is important to assess and understand the current system in place. Obtaining feedback from colleagues on the current system and any improvements to be made is essential at this stage. Streamlining of communication channels is important.

Keeping an open mind and looking for avenues to streamline communication channels is important. Ensuring that communication remains confidential, secure, and can be conveyed in a simple manner is important (Schouten et al., 2020). Giving everyone a voice is critical in coming up with a communication strategy.

Gathering input from colleagues, participants, and other necessary stakeholders ensures improved communication among all involved parties. Placing focus on face-to-face communication is important. Physical meetings and communication help form stronger bonds among involved parties, making it easier to implement the strategies.

References.

Jastreboff, A. M., Kotz, C. M., Kahan, S., Kelly, A. S., & Heymsfield, S. B. (2019). Obesity as a Disease: The Obesity Society 2018 Position Statement. Obesity (Silver Spring, Md.), 27(1), 7–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/oby.22378

Kadota, A., Okuda, N., Ohkubo, T., Okamura, T., Nishi, N., Ueshima, H., Okayama, A., & Miura, K. (2018). The National Integrated Project for Prospective Observation of Non-communicable Disease and its Trends in the Aged 2010 (NIPPON DATA2010): Objectives, Design, and Population Characteristics. Journal Of Epidemiology, 28 Suppl 3(Suppl 3), S2–S9. https://doi.org/10.2188/jea.JE20170240

Karacabeyli, D., Allender, S., Pinkney, S., & Amed, S. (2018). Evaluation of complex community-based childhood obesity prevention interventions. Obesity Reviews: An Official Journal Of The International Association For The Study Of Obesity, 19(8), 1080–1092. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12689.

Liu, J., Lee, B., McLeod, D. M., & Choung, H. (2019). Framing Obesity: Effects of Obesity Labeling and Prevalence Statistics on Public Perceptions. Health Education & Behavior: The Official Publication Of The Society For Public Health Education, 46(2), 322–328. https://doi.org/10.1177/1090198118788907

Schouten, B. C., Cox, A., Duran, G., Kerremans, K., Banning, L. K., Lahdidioui, A., van den Muijsenbergh, M., Schinkel, S., Sungur, H., Suurmond, J., Zendedel, R., & Krystallidou, D. (2020). Mitigating language and cultural barriers in healthcare communication: Toward a holistic approach. Patient education and counseling, S0738-3991(20)30242-1. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.05.001

Tyson, N., & Frank, M. (2018). Childhood and adolescent obesity definitions as related to BMI, evaluation and management options. Best practice & research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 48, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.06.003

Wolfenden, L., Goldman, S., Stacey, F. G., Grady, A., Kingsland, M., Williams, C. M., Wiggers, J., Milat, A., Rissel, C., Bauman, A., Farrell, M. M., Légaré, F., Ben Charif, A., Zomahoun, H., Hodder, R. K., Jones, J., Booth, D., Parmenter, B., Regan, T., & Yoong, S. L. (2018). Strategies to improve the implementation of workplace-based policies or practices targeting tobacco, alcohol, diet, physical activity, and obesity. The Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews, 11(11), CD012439. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012439.pub2

Xiao, Y., Chen, S., Miao, S., & Yu, Y. (2022). Exploring the Mediating Effect of Physical Activities on Built Environment and Obesity for Elderly People: Evidence From Shanghai, China. Frontiers In Public Health, 10, 853292. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.853292

Assessment 3 Instructions: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

Create a 3-5 page paper identifying the health concern that you think is most appropriate to address for the community in your practice environment. Your choice should be based on the evaluation the relevant data that you have gathered for your chosen issue.

Master’s-level nurses need to be able to think beyond the bedside. It is important to be able to research, synthesize, and apply evidence that will result in improved health outcomes for the communities and populations that are part of your care setting. Improving outcomes at a community or population level, even incrementally, can create noticeable and significant aggregate health improvements across all of a care setting’s patients.

Scenario

NURS-FPX6011 Assessment 3 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Paper

Your organization has created an initiative to improve one of the pervasive and chronic health concerns in the community. Some examples of possibilities for health improvement initiatives are nationwide concerns, such as type 2 diabetes, HIV, obesity, and the Zika virus. However, your organization wants you to identify the health concern that is most appropriate to address for the community in your practice environment. You will need to do your own research to gather and evaluate the relevant data for your chosen issue.

NURS-FPX6011 Assessment 3 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Paper Instructions

The bullet points below correspond to grading criteria in the scoring guide. Be sure that your population health improvement plan addresses all of the bullets below, at minimum. You may also want to read the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Scoring Guide and Guiding Questions: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan [DOCX] to better understand how each criterion will be assessed:

- Evaluate the environmental and epidemiological data about your community so that you can illustrate and diagnose widespread population health issues.
- Develop an ethical health improvement plan that addresses the population health issue you have identified in your evaluation. The plan should be based upon the best available evidence and meet the cultural and environmental needs of your community.
- Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis for your population health improvement plan.
- Propose criteria that can be used to evaluate the achievement of your health improvement plan’s outcomes.
- Explain how you plan to apply strategies for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way about the development and implementation of your health improvement plan.
- Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Example assessment: You may use the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Example [PPTX] to give you an idea of what a Proficient or higher rating on the scoring guide would look like.

APA Resources: You may use the APA Style Paper Tutorial [DOCX] and the APA Style Paper Template [DOCX] to ensure your assessment is formatted in appropriate APA style.

Submission Requirements

- Length of submission: 3–5 double-spaced, typed pages. Your plan should be succinct yet substantive.
- Number of references: Cite a minimum of 3–5 sources of scholarly or professional evidence that support your evaluation, recommendations, and plans.
- APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA style.

Competencies Measured

By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the course competencies through the following assessment scoring guide criteria:

- Competency 2: Apply evidence-based practice to design interventions to improve population health.

- - Evaluate environmental and epidemiological data regarding a community in order to diagnose widespread population health issues.
  - Develop an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community that is based upon the best available evidence and meets the cultural and environmental needs of the community.
- Competency 3: Evaluate outcomes of evidence-based interventions.

- - Propose criteria that will be used to evaluate achievement of outcomes for a population health improvement plan.
- Competency 4: Evaluate the value and relative weight of available evidence upon which to make a clinical decision.

- - Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis for a population health improvement plan.
- Competency 5: Synthesize evidence-based practice and academic research to communicate effective solutions.

- - Apply strategies for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.
  - Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan Scoring Guide

CRITERIA	NON-PERFORMANCE	BASIC	PROFICIENT	DISTINGUISHED
Evaluate environmental and epidemiological data regarding a community in order to diagnose widespread population health issues.	Does not evaluate environmental and epidemiological data regarding a community in order to diagnose widespread population health issues.	Evaluates environmental or epidemiological data poorly, leading to a flawed diagnosis of population health issues.	Evaluates environmental and epidemiological data regarding a community in order to diagnose widespread population health issues.	Evaluates environmental and epidemiological data regarding a community in order to diagnose widespread population health issues. Identifies knowledge gaps, unknowns, missing information, unanswered questions, or areas of uncertainty (where further information could improve the evaluation).
Develop an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community that is based upon the best available evidence and meets the cultural and environmental needs of the community.	Does not develop an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community that is based upon the best available evidence and meets the cultural and environmental needs of the community.	Develops a health improvement plan that falls short or fails to address one or more aspects (ethics, addressing the population health issue, using best available evidence, or meeting the cultural and environmental needs of the community).	Develops an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community that is based upon the best available evidence and meets the cultural and environmental needs of the community.	Develops an ethical health improvement plan to address a population health issue within a community that is based upon the best available evidence and meets the cultural and environmental needs of the community. Identifies assumptions on which the plan is based.
Justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis for a population health improvement plan.	Does not justify the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.	Provides a weak or flawed justification of the value or relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.	Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan.	Justifies the value and relevance of evidence used as the basis of a population health improvement plan, and impartially considers conflicting data and other perspectives.
Propose criteria that will be used to evaluate achievement of outcomes for a population health improvement plan.	Does not propose criteria that will be used to evaluate achievement of outcomes for a population health improvement plan.	Proposes criteria that are not well suited to evaluating achievement of outcomes for a population health improvement plan.	Proposes criteria that will be used to evaluate achievement of outcomes for a population health improvement plan.	Proposes criteria that will be used to evaluate achievement of outcomes for a population health improvement plan, and explains why other possible criteria were considered and rejected.
Apply strategies for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.	Does not apply strategies for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.	Strategies used for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession fall short of being ethical, culturally sensitive, or inclusive.	Applies strategies for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way.	Applies strategies for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way. Acknowledges potential difficulties and discusses how those challenges will be met.
Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.	Does not integrate relevant sources to support assertions; does not correctly format citations and references using APA style.	Sources lack relevance or are poorly integrated, or citations or references are incorrectly formatted.	Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.	Integrates relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style. Citations are free from all errors.

Guiding Questions

Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

This document is designed to give you questions to consider and additional guidance to help you successfully complete the Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan assessment. You may find it useful to use this document as a pre-writing exercise or as a final check to ensure that you have sufficiently addressed all the grading criteria for this assessment. This document is a resource to help you complete the assessment. Do not turn in this document as your assessment submission.

Evaluate the environmental and epidemiological data about your community so that you can illustrate and diagnose widespread population health issues.

What is the relevant demographic data for your community?
What does the epidemiological data about your community suggest are its biggest health concerns?
How do environmental factors in the community contribute or pose challenges to the health of residents?

Develop an ethical health improvement plan that addresses the population health issue you have identified in your evaluation. The plan should be based upon the best available evidence and meet the cultural and environmental needs of your community.

Did you use a minimum of 3–5 sources of professional and scholarly evidence to support your health improvement plan?
Does your health improvement plan consider the environmental realities and challenges that exist in your community?
Does your health improvement plan address potential barriers or misunderstandings related to the various cultures prevalent in your community?
Does your plan effectively address the needs of the community around a specific health concern?
- Will your plan likely lead to some improvement in the community’s health related to this health concern?

Justify the value and relevance of the evidence you used as the basis for your population health improvement plan.

Have you noted why the evidence you have presented in your health improvement plan is valuable and relevant to the health issue and community you are addressing?
Have you explained why each particular piece of evidence is appropriate and informs the goal of improving the health of the community?

Propose criteria that can be used to evaluate the achievement of your health improvement plan’s outcomes.

Are the criteria that you proposed measurable?
Are the criteria you proposed relevant to your desired outcomes?
Have you at least noted how the criteria can be used as an evaluative tool?

Explain how you plan to apply strategies for communicating with community members and colleagues in the health care profession in an ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive way about the development and implementation of your health improvement plan.

Do you have clear strategies for communicating with colleagues?
- Are they mindful of cultural and ethical expectations for data privacy?
Do you have clear strategies for communicating with the community or community stakeholders?
- Are they mindful of cultural and ethical expectations for data privacy?
  - Are these strategies inclusive?
  - In other words, will they allow you to make complex medical terms and concepts understandable to members of your community, regardless of language, disabilities, or level of education?

Integrate relevant sources to support assertions, correctly formatting citations and references using APA style.

Did you use 3–5 sources?
Are they cited in APA format throughout the plan?
Have you included an attached reference list?